Changes to venture capital company tax regime

The South African National Treasury introduced the venture capital company (VCC) regime in section 12J of the Income Tax Act in 2008 as an incentive for investors to make equity funding available to small and upcoming businesses housed in qualifying companies. Despite the fact that the uptake of the incentive has increased substantially over the past few years, it appears as if some of this growth may have been on the back of structures that were contrary to the original purpose of the regime.

A number of amendments have been made to the regime to exclude these structures from benefitting from the incentive. This article provides an overview of some of these amendments that VCCs and investors should be aware of.

Additional requirements at the investor level

Structures that enabled an investor to individually invest in specific ring-fenced underlying assets of the VCC, as opposed to being one of a pool of investors in the assets of the VCC, are targeted by the amendments. New rules aimed at limiting this practice include:

  • If the VCC issues different classes of shares, no single investor can hold more than 20% of the shares of any class after the expiry of 36 months from the date that shares of that class were first issued. This prevents a scenario where a single investor can be the only holder of a particular class of share.
  • Where a VCC has subscribed for shares in an investee company and any person who holds a share in that VCC, directly or indirectly together with its connected persons, hold more than 50% of the participation rights of that investee company, the investee company will not be a qualifying company.  If a VCC invests in a non-qualifying company this will result in the VCC acting outside its permitted  objects and possibly also breaching the thresholds applicable to the deployment of its funds.

Additional requirements at a qualifying company level

An essential element of the incentive is that it characterises the types of investee companies (qualifying companies) to which a VCC needs to deploy funds. The investee companies in which a VCC can invest as qualifying companies have been narrowed by excluding: 

  • Companies that acquired a venture, business or undertaking from an investor in the VCC or a connected person to an investor. This rule is presumably aimed curbing arrangements where a VCC investor transfers existing businesses owned by it into a qualifying company and enjoys the tax benefit, while continuing to operate the business as it did before.
  • Companies that, after 36 months from the date when the VCC has subscribed for its shares, derive more than 50% of its total receipts or accruals of any trade is from investors in the VCC or their connected persons. By implication, a qualifying company should primarily derive its income from dealings with third parties in the long-run rather than depend on related persons.

Relaxation of rules

The application of the requirement that a qualifying company should not not derive more than 20% of its income from investment income has been moved to three years after the VCC first subscribed for shares in the company.  A company that does not derive income other than incidental investment income while operations have not yet commenced would therefore still be a qualifying company during the three year period.

Founder and manager shares are no longer considered to be venture capital shares, in respect of which strict requirements apply.  These shares can be distinguished from those subscribed for by investors as no deduction is granted to the founder or manager  if shares are acquired in exchange for services rendered.

 

 

 

 

Articles

Responding to SARS requests for information

Responding to SARS requests for information

  SARS’ investigative process includes requesting information from taxpayers. In February 2024, the Western Cape High Court delivered judgment in  CSARS v J Company. This case deals with requests for relevant material. This article considers the requirements...

Changing course during a tax dispute

Changing course during a tax dispute

Taxpayers often refine their grounds and arguments as a tax dispute progresses. The Western Cape Division of the High Court recently considered such a change in Baseline Civil Contractors (Pty) Ltd v CSARS. This article briefly reviews the case and what other...

CFCs: The FBE exemption and outsourcing

CFCs: The FBE exemption and outsourcing

South Africa introduced controlled foreign company (‘CFC’) rules when it   adopted a residence-based tax system in 2001. These rules target passive or mobile income that escapes South African tax by accruing or diverting it to offshore companies controlled by...

VAT Apportionment: Revised ruling

VAT Apportionment: Revised ruling

Registered VAT vendors can deduct input tax in respect of goods and services supplied to them. However, they may only deduct such input tax only if, or to the extent, that they acquired goods or services to use, consume or supply in the course of making taxable...

Need Advice?

We regularly advise and assist clients with South African tax matters. Do you need an opinion on the South African tax implications of a transaction or arrangement? Do you require assistance to resolve a tax dispute?

Contact Us

+27 (083) 417 5904

pieter@pvdz.co.za

pieter.van.der.zwan.sa