Proposal to cushion Practice Note 31’s withdrawal

  The National Treasury published the draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill for the 2023 legislative cycle on 31 July 2023. It contains a proposal that relates to the withdrawal of Practice Note 31 of 1994 (‘PN31’). This article considers the background and proposed rules.

Practice Note 31

Section 24J(2) allows a taxpayer to deduct interest incurred from its income from carrying on any trade, if incurred in the production of income. A taxpayer that borrows funds to on-lend, without doing so in the course of a trade (typically, if the taxpayer does not carry on business as a money-lender), may not necessarily satisfy the trade requirement.

The Inland Revenue (now SARS) issued PN31 in 1994 aimed at such loans. It states:

‘While it is evident that a person (not being a moneylender) earning interest on capital or surplus funds invested does not carry on a trade and that any expenditure incurred in the production of such interest cannot be allowed as a deduction, it is nevertheless the practice of Inland Revenue to allow expenditure incurred in the production of the interest to the extent that it does not exceed such income.’

Taxpayers who borrow funds to advance to others, often related parties, benefitted from this practice. In a corporate context, these entities often act as group treasury entities.

In December 2022, SARS indicated that it intended to withdraw PN31 due to misuse. Following public consultation, the withdrawal was postponed to provide a solution to accommodate legitimate transactions that benefitted from PN31.

Proposed amendments

The proposed section 11G contains this solution. If enacted, it will apply for years of assessment starting 1 January 2024.

The proposal is to allow a deduction for expenditure not of a capital nature to the extent that it is incurred by a company (‘lender’) in the production of interest income:

  • from another company that forms part of the same group of companies (‘borrower’)
  • as a result of a loan, advance or credit advanced by that lender, directly or indirectly, to that borrower.

The explanatory memorandum that accompanies the proposed legislation suggests that the National Treasury contemplates a further requirement: the borrower must have used the funds for purposes of its trade to produce income. This requirement is not apparent from the wording of the draft section. 

The explanatory memorandum indicates that the combination of the three requirements aims to ensure that no tax leakage arises where one group company raises funds to lend to another group company for productive purposes. The deduction will be limited to the interest income from the loan.

It is important to note that the above is still a proposal and may change following the consultation process ahead. Taxpayers affected by the development should keep an eye on the process and legislation ultimately enacted as it unfolds.  

Articles

Responding to SARS requests for information

Responding to SARS requests for information

  SARS’ investigative process includes requesting information from taxpayers. In February 2024, the Western Cape High Court delivered judgment in  CSARS v J Company. This case deals with requests for relevant material. This article considers the requirements...

Changing course during a tax dispute

Changing course during a tax dispute

Taxpayers often refine their grounds and arguments as a tax dispute progresses. The Western Cape Division of the High Court recently considered such a change in Baseline Civil Contractors (Pty) Ltd v CSARS. This article briefly reviews the case and what other...

CFCs: The FBE exemption and outsourcing

CFCs: The FBE exemption and outsourcing

South Africa introduced controlled foreign company (‘CFC’) rules when it   adopted a residence-based tax system in 2001. These rules target passive or mobile income that escapes South African tax by accruing or diverting it to offshore companies controlled by...

VAT Apportionment: Revised ruling

VAT Apportionment: Revised ruling

Registered VAT vendors can deduct input tax in respect of goods and services supplied to them. However, they may only deduct such input tax only if, or to the extent, that they acquired goods or services to use, consume or supply in the course of making taxable...

Need Advice?

We regularly advise and assist clients with South African tax matters. Do you need an opinion on the South African tax implications of a transaction or arrangement? Do you require assistance to resolve a tax dispute?

Contact Us

+27 (083) 417 5904

pieter@pvdz.co.za

pieter.van.der.zwan.sa